Live Blog
AS IT HAPPENED: #RHLaw Oral Arguments
-
CJ: Your legal conclusions: 1) person who used contraceptives has violated Consti; 2) person who underwent ligation/vasectomy violated RPCby Supreme Court PIO via twitter 7/9/2013 10:02:59 AM -
Sereno asks to review Noche's answer. #RHlaw -
Justice Antonio Carpio again #RHlawby Carmela Fonbuena via twitter 7/9/2013 10:04:39 AM -
J Carpio: The policy of the law is to protect the implantation of the fertilized ovum. It does not prevent the FO from reaching the uterusby Supreme Court PIO via twitter 7/9/2013 10:07:05 AM
-
CARPIO: "No conflict between your definition of conception and law's definition. Intention of the law is similar to your intention." #RHlawby Carmela Fonbuena via twitter 7/9/2013 10:08:01 AM
-
But Noche notes ambiguities in the law #RHlawby Carmela Fonbuena via twitter 7/9/2013 10:08:19 AM
-
Carpio: The textual policy in #RHlaw does not say that life begins at implantation. So there is no difference in your arguments?
-
Carpio: We have to look at the law. You came here on an assumption. You cannot just come here and say all these drugs. #RHlaw
-
J Carpio: You can not just come here and say that all of these drugs violate the Constitutionby Supreme Court PIO via twitter 7/9/2013 10:10:15 AM
-
CARPIO: The law protects travel of ovum to wall of uterus. Law consistent with NOCHE notes it's only the case TEXTUALLY #RHlawby Carmela Fonbuena via twitter 7/9/2013 10:10:35 AM
-
Sereno: Textually, the law does not say that life starts at implantation. Correct? Noche: Yes. #RHlaw
-
Carpio: There is no difference on your concept on the definition of conception with the law? Noche: It contradicts on some sections. #RHlaw
-
CARPIO: There is no controversy here. You agree with the text of the law. Why are you here? #RHlawby Carmela Fonbuena via twitter 7/9/2013 10:14:37 AM
-
Noche repeats there are ambiguities in the law #RHlawby Carmela Fonbuena via twitter 7/9/2013 10:14:53 AM
-
Carpio: So why are you here?! Noche: There are certain provisions with ambiguity. Noche: *after looking* Section 9! #RHLaw
-
Interesting. Some nuns and priests leaving the Supreme Court. #RHlaw
-
People wearing purple staying in the Supreme Court. #RHlaw
-
-
Carpio now asks Noche for more provisions. Noche taking a while looking. #RHlaw
-
Noche still looking... #RHlaw
-
J Carpio: If you are asking us to decide on the abortive capabilities of IUDs,then you are admitting that you came to this Court prematurelyby Supreme Court PIO via twitter 7/9/2013 10:26:57 AM
-
Sereno: Counsel... Just put it in a memorandum.. #RHlaw Noche: Okay, okay..
-
Justice Bernabe now asking Noche questions. #RHlaw
-
J Carpio: FDA is the agency mandated to decide WON a product or supply is an abortifacient. You go to them first, not to Usby Supreme Court PIO via twitter 7/9/2013 10:28:34 AM
-
NOW: Justice Estela Perlas-Bernabe #RHlawby Carmela Fonbuena via twitter 7/9/2013 10:28:46 AM
-
Bernabe: When you say abortive effect, meaning? Noche: It prevents the fertalize ovum to reach the uterus or was not able to implant. #RHlaw
